Navigating Insider Trading Rules in Your ESPP: Understanding Blackout Periods, Legal Gray Areas, and Best Practices

Written By: Robyn Shutak

When it comes to Employee Stock Purchase Plans (ESPPs), few topics create as much uncertainty as insider trading and blackout windows. While most equity plan professionals can easily explain the rules for option exercises or RSU releases, ESPPs live in a murkier zone that blends administrative practicality with legal interpretation.

This article breaks down the gray areas, clarifies where the risks truly lie, and provides best practices to help your organization stay compliant while maintaining broad-based employee participation.

The General Rule: What Insider Trading Laws Prohibit

Under U.S. securities laws, employees who have access to material nonpublic information (MNPI) are prohibited from buying or selling company stock while in possession of that information.

Most companies reinforce this through insider trading policies that establish blackout periods around:

  • Quarterly earnings announcements
  • M&A or financing activity
  • Material product launches or other market-sensitive events

At a high level, any purchase or sale of company securities can fall under those restrictions. But how do these rules apply to an ESPP, especially when participation is automatic and ongoing?

Key Questions Companies Face

In practice, issuers and administrators often grapple with three common questions:

  1. Does enrolling in an ESPP count as an investment decision?
  2. Are participation changes (like starting, stopping, or adjusting contributions) also considered investment decisions?
  3. What happens when a scheduled purchase occurs during a blackout period?

These questions are not just theoretical—they have real implications for compliance, employee experience, and communication strategy.

What Practice Shows: Why ESPPs Are Treated Differently

While blackout periods can limit when employees may sell or transfer ESPP shares, they rarely impact enrollment, contribution, or purchase dates.

Here’s why: when employees acquire shares directly from the issuer rather than on the open market, the transaction typically doesn’t raise insider trading or Rule 10b5-1 concerns. The company, not the market, is the counterparty, and the purchases occur under a predetermined, nondiscretionary plan.

From a U.S. legal perspective, that means regularly scheduled purchases under a qualified ESPP are generally viewed as low risk.

However, gray areas persist, particularly for companies that:

  • Have extended blackout periods, or
  • Employ participants who regularly possess MNPI (for example, in finance, legal, or strategy roles).

Issuer vs. Open Market: Why Purchase Method Matters

Purchase MethodInsider Trading RiskNotes
From the issuer (newly issued shares)LowStandard for qualified ESPPs; purchases are automatic and nondiscretionary
Open market purchasesHigherEmployees effectively trade in the market and may be aware of MNPI

Companies using open-market ESPPs often take a more conservative stance, aligning enrollment and participation changes with open trading windows to reduce perceived risk.

Practical Steps for Issuers

To balance compliance with accessibility, companies should:

  1. Confirm with Legal Counsel
    Ensure your insider trading policy clearly addresses ESPP enrollment, contribution changes, and purchase activity.
  2. Document the Rationale
    Keep records explaining why certain plan features—such as purchase timing or blackout treatment—are compliant, especially for open-market plans or global participants.
  3. Communicate Early and Often
    Clarify to employees how blackout periods affect their ESPP participation: purchases may proceed, but sales remain restricted.
  4. Adjust Enrollment Windows When Needed
    If a blackout overlaps an offering start date, extend the window so all employees can participate equitably.
  5. Educate Insiders
    Reinforce that while purchases may be automatic, selling ESPP shares during blackout periods remains prohibited.

The Bottom Line

ESPPs are designed to build long-term ownership, not to enable short-term trading. For most companies, regularly scheduled purchases from the issuer present minimal insider trading risk, but clarity and consistency are key.

A well-documented policy, paired with clear communication and training, ensures compliance while preserving the spirit of broad-based ownership that ESPPs are meant to foster.

Need help refining your company’s ESPP policies or employee communication strategy? Infinite Equity’s experts partner with public and private companies to build clarity, confidence, and compliance across every aspect of equity compensation. Contact us to ensure your ESPP is structured and communicated for maximum participation and minimal risk.

Don’t Overlook This ESPP Requirement Reporting Qualifying Dispositions

Don’t Overlook This ESPP Requirement: Reporting Qualifying Dispositions

As year-end reporting picks up, one topic always creates questions: qualifying dispositions under a Section 423 ESPP. Companies of all sizes still struggle with whether...
Navigating the $25,000 ESPP Limit

Navigating the $25,000 ESPP Limit: What It Is, Why It Matters, and How to Work With It

Employee Stock Purchase Plans (ESPPs) are one of the most effective ways to help employees become company owners. But one IRS rule often causes confusion:...
Are qualified ESPPs worth the complexity

Qualified ESPPs: How to Navigate Tax Rules and Maximize Benefits

Qualified 423 Employee Stock Purchase Plans (“ESPPs”) have the potential to offer meaningful tax benefits to employees if they meet the qualified disposition rules. In practice,...