Understanding IRC Section 280G Calculations: Golden Parachute Payments and Tax Implications

Written By: Daniella Butler, infiniteequity

As M&A activity continues to accelerate, understanding the tax implications of executive payouts has become increasingly important for boards, compensation committees, and deal teams. One of the most technical and consequential areas is IRC Section 280G, which governs how “golden parachute” payments are treated during a corporate change in control.

Section 280G limits a company’s ability to deduct certain compensation payments made to top executives when those payments are triggered by a merger or acquisition. If parachute payments exceed a specific threshold, they can result in both a loss of corporate tax deduction and a 20% excise tax for the executive receiving the payout.

Key Concepts in 280G Calculations

Parachute Payments – Payments or benefits triggered by a change in control, such as severance, accelerated vesting of equity, bonuses, or other contingent compensation.

Base Amount – The executive’s average annual taxable compensation over the five years preceding the change in control. This serves as the baseline for testing excess parachute payments.

Excess Parachute Payment – If the total parachute payments equal or exceed three times the base amount, the excess over one times the base amount becomes non-deductible for the company and subject to a 20% excise tax under Section 4999.

Example

An executive’s base amount is $500,000. If they receive $1.6 million in parachute payments as part of a merger:

  • 3 × base amount = $1.5 million
  • Total parachute payments = $1.6 million
  • Excess = $1.6 million – $500,000 = $1.1 million

The company cannot deduct $1.1 million, and the executive pays a 20% excise tax on that amount.

Mitigating 280G Consequences

Companies often take proactive steps to minimize 280G exposure, including:

  • Shareholder approval for private companies to exempt payments
  • Cutback provisions that reduce payouts to stay below the 3× threshold
  • Valuation studies to allocate value appropriately between contingent and non-contingent compensation elements

Final Takeaway

Navigating 280G rules requires a blend of technical tax expertise, executive compensation insight, and defensible valuation modeling. It’s critical that your company is able to: 

  • Determine base amounts and parachute payment values
  • Model payout alternatives, such as cutbacks or gross-ups
  • Prepare documentation for shareholder approvals and audit support

280G compliance is not just a technical exercise; it’s a critical component of sound deal planning. By engaging experts early, companies can ensure alignment between executive incentives, shareholder interests, and tax efficiency.

To discuss how Infinite Equity can model, document, and defend your 280G calculations, contact us here

280G Calculations in Proxy Termination Tables

280G Calculations in Proxy Termination Tables: What Companies Should Know

Executive pay transparency has brought Section 280G calculations out of the shadows and into public view. Within the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in...
Navigating the $25,000 ESPP Limit

Equity Acceleration and 280G: How to Model Awards Correctly

Equity awards often represent the largest component of change-in-control compensation, yet they are also the most complex to evaluate. When a deal triggers early vesting...
Understanding IRC Section 280G Golden Parachute Tax Explained

Understanding IRC Section 280G: Golden Parachute Tax Explained

In any merger or acquisition, few topics demand more technical accuracy than IRC Section 280G. Known as the golden parachute rule, it governs how executive...